Tuesday, 2 February 2016

The best smart-phone?

So many years gone by, the needs to purchase smartphones by many individuals have become the targets for technology seekers and hence the sellers to penetrate the market which dictate the highly demanded gadgets in hands.

Nothing can change the fact that every year, the competitive advantages of the companies producing the gadgets have created many job opportunities to many countries and the sources of income for importers and exporters globally.

Advantages in the use of the gadgets outweigh the blunders in using them. Without smart-phones, the blunders would become worse due to important messages cannot be communicated at the right time and that consumers  who are highly engrossed with the social networking media (instead of social media) to earn a living (especially those who are service-centred business communities who must have their handhelds 24-7) are at stake.

The above will inevitably become a nuisance if the smart-phones are found to be missing or the smart-phones themselves are experiencing slow-down period or malfunctions or hacked for various reasons by unknown or unscrupulous parties. Some telco companies are also in their research and development stage (R&D) in capturing large market shares (and thus inflows of income) in their drive to retain loyal customers and also to extend their clientele base.

Purchasers of smart-phones whether they are salaried people or business people have to accept that their use of smart-phones have become one of the distinctive factors in determining the programmes or softwares to be created for diverse groups of clients as such. High-end consumers need high-end smart-phones. Some of the rich and poor people are using smart-phones not based on their status in the society, but rather based on how well  (determined by their purchasing power) they can own or possess the smart-phones  either in the form of direct acquisition such as in outright purchase, easy-installment payments, leveraged-waiting-for-the-cheap-priced-phones-to-be-sold-by-desperate-consumers-due-to economic turmoil, or in the form of a gift (company’s party, birthday presents, lucky draws, some are found in public places).

Whenever we see a person holding any particular smart-phone (branded or otherwise), the first impression is that we basically ponder upon whether the smart-phone is owned by him/ her indefinitely or is it ‘descended’ from  someone who has got some hardship or pleasure in getting the phones at hand so to speak?

Not many purchasers are actually willing buyers in economic term;  the very need to purchase the smart-phone  is  such a neglected phrase so as to give way to the more aspiring term as found in a smart person’s smart-phone  generally.

Are you (and your smart-phone(s)) brilliant enough to counter the effects of diminishing income due to the risks of depreciation and downward (obsolete) technological factors of the gadgets?






No comments:

Post a Comment

Ethics

Some people might be surprised when I did not want to reply greetings from a banker when I closed my banking account in a bank (no need to m...