A rhetoric - What's lost is not gone

1. Obviously, today's economy has something to spell out concerning how meagre the income of individuals and companies are, despite efforts to protect them by means of insurance or savings.
2. Uncertainty is risk in nature. Corporations who are dealing in investments are challenged with the biggest sporadic investment schemes which the professionals are so revile in their pursuit of gaining momentum of higher dividends and capital gains, beforehand.
3. Notwithstanding, there are still in existence of schemes which are abstract (or abstraction rather) of what consist of investment policies by those corporations, excluding those individuals who are indirectly investing money in such abstract schemes of investment. The amount is surprisingly huge and nothing can be done to ensure those investments are safe and protected.
4. Does it mean that banks and investment companies are not comprehensively protected or that investors are just bunches of novice who are just demanding great dividend amounts and never see the risks inherent in their investments? Very cynical it is as to show that how shallow the number of investment professionals are in existent and this demarcates the assumption that investors are so naïve as compared to the stock bourses existing in our country.
5. Speaking of the above, many countries are losing billions of dollars in the previous 1997-1998 currency crisis not to mention sub-prime effects in the States. See how the flow of these recessions are put in graphs negating the surge of demand and supply of money. Consequently, many countries are still crawling to achieve surplus in their balance of trade and they are still struggling to repay their previous loans. How are these countries as investors are being protected, and how the dynamics of these have an impact to the well-being of the people : are still an abstract to majority of the populations.
6. I just need to add a very simple explanation from someone who I met whereby he invested his money into unit trusts. He said to me that the risk is lower and the dividend is a surety but the amount is minute. He said in stock markets, if you are brave and durable, you can make yourself a billionaire in an instant. I was so surprised to hear that since he was asking money from me a few weeks ago to buy milk for his baby. He can talk like a consultant in which case he even advised me to check the stock market movement and blue-chips in the newspapers everyday.
7. I wonder if the stock prices were to fall again, how is he going to feed his baby? Is it so sarcastic for me to ask such a question?
8. And today the newspapers printed the most recent investment schemes which are unspeakable. The wavelength of the abstraction is in actual fact verbatim.
9. When it comes to money, not even a President of a giant bank will  see your face and vice versa. Is it a rhetoric or just a plain 'ignorance is bliss' cliché?