Sometimes we do not see what we need to see in newspapers articles. For example some jewelleries may be borrowed by certain VIPs but there is no mention about how much is it to borrow jewelleries from others? Are they forced to borrow a diamond or a necklace just to go to a dinner party or sth like that? I would guess they are the kinds of people who only wear a cloth and throw it away like diapers. And the same design or colour (color) cannot be seen when they wear another cloth - sth like that.
The addiction to collect jewelleries and diamonds is sensitive. Some of them who are not experts in diamonds and gold would never appreciate the exclusivity when they attach the diamonds to their fingers or necks or even handbags. Those obsession is extremely futile if they were to shop at flea markets or even the Robinson's. I mean they are rich and famous in their own mould. Sort of.
So I believe that a cheaper and higher quality car doesn't need diamonds or jewelleries as part of it. Unless the prices of diamonds and jewelleries are embedded in the prices of cars to such an extent that everything what they (the diamond fanatics) see must be of a type of ruby or ranking pari passu thereto.
I don't need to meet those fanatics for sure!
No comments:
Post a Comment