When someone dies, he/ she is leaving all his/ her possessions such as valuables and inheritances.
If the properties can speak by themselves, for sure they are able to pronounce with names specifically who shall be the next heir to inherit those possessions. Nevertheless, there is no such things as IT advancements nowadays to presume such inheritance in a way that those possessions can speak by themselves to whom they may concern. This new technology was supposed to be invented long before the advent of Computers (calculators) and mainframes (a big machine such as used by IBM decades ago).
When a person dies intestate, there shall be disgruntled people who would act like hooligans or snatchers (my phrase) because they are so adamant to get what they want from the very day a person passes away.
Have you ever heard of some spooky stories when some people have got to deal with nightmares, dreams, some are being possessed with holy spirits whatsoever, to the extent that they can't even sleep for more 3 months not for mourning the deceased, but because they are crying why a gold ring with diamond which is supposed to be inherited to the right person has been "snatched away" by some relatives who are so much inclined to own it before the person had had the ring in her finger.
Some time ago, we heard about a ring which costs more than hundreds of millions of Ringgit being bought by a dignitary. Nobody knows hitherto, how much is the actual cost of purchasing the ring and what is the heck that particular ring has to do with the administration of a multi-cultural country like Malaysia. And how many rings should that particular person who bought it using Consolidated Funds can wear at one point of time and in what events that ring may be worn?
A gold ring with diamond is very expensive not in monetary value to me. But it resembles the values intrinsic to the lineage and compositions of the owners of the said ring. When a person snatches away such a ring from the deceased, of course the deceased would never get up and claim the ring back. I would rather say that the ring shall be looking for the right person (new owner) by itself. And the rightful snatcher of the said ring shall be puzzled as to how the ring is to be kept and how can the new owner get to know that the ring is his/hers and how to get it from the snatcher?
When a queen of a particular state has the knowledge about this ring, what shall she do? Nobody shall make it a spooky story as the ring is supposed to be inherited to someone who is qualified to wear it and the ring must be unencumbered (cannot be mortgaged or sold or used by outsiders or third parties).
The same goes with the ring, as much as the ring does not accept the person who snatches it on her finger, it is sad also to see how a queen cannot be accepted in some other people's state.
Only one person can hear the gold ring with diamond cries. And nobody can hear exactly how a sad queen cries every night when the missing ring has come to her knowledge, when the gold ring with diamond struggles to release itself from the person it should not belong to.
P/S: Since I do not have a smartphone at this moment, I am unable to snap the picture of and descriptions to the gold ring with diamond. And I don't think I should add more sadness to the people who are still mourning their loved one who has just passed away. - Al-Fatihah.
No comments:
Post a Comment